![]() ![]() Meta-synthesis methodological integrity psychotherapy qualitative meta-analysis trustworthiness. The goal of this study is to present a brief theoretical foundation, computational resources and workflow outline along with a working example for performing systematic or rapid reviews of basic research followed by meta-analysis. The paper provides guidance for researchers who desire to tailor meta-analytic methods to meet their particular goals while enhancing the rigor of their research. Meta-analysts are encouraged to consider the methodological integrity of their studies in relation to central research processes, including identifying a set of primary research studies, transforming primary findings into initial units of data for a meta-analysis, developing categories or themes, and communicating findings. Through the paper, recommendations are provided to help researchers identify procedures that can best serve their studies' specific goals. A meta-analysis is a method of combining data from multiple independent studies that are investigating the same research question. Rather than arguing for the adoption of any single meta-method, this paper advocates for considering how procedures can best be selected and adapted to enhance a meta-study's methodological integrity. Recommendations have broad relevance but are framed with an eye toward their use in psychotherapy research. Meta analysis can be misleading if the studies included are dissimilar in their research question or collect different types of outcome data. Can only be applied to studies that collected data in a statistically valid manner. To statistically analyze the results of a large collection of studies. from experiments, surveys, and observations). Effect sizes of interest depend on the research objective and type of study. This paper explains the function of qualitative meta-analyses and their methodological development. To analyze data collected in a statistically valid manner (e.g. The term Meta-analysis was coined by Gene Glass (1976). They are obtained from each of the primary studies prior to the meta-analysis. Like quantitative meta-analyses, these methods function to aggregate findings and identify patterns across primary studies, but their aims, procedures, and methodological considerations may vary. A meta-analysis is the statistical process of analyzing and combining results from several similar studies. ![]() Although qualitative research has long been of interest in the field of psychology, meta-analyses of qualitative literatures (sometimes called meta-syntheses) are still quite rare. A systematic review attempts to gather all available empirical research by using clearly defined, systematic methods to obtain answers to a specific question. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |